EigenLayer on security record
8.2/ 35% of the score
In production since 2023 holding a very large deposit base with published audits and no exploit on record; slashing is being enabled in stages, which the protocol documents.
Journalism for the digital-asset economy
Best DeFi Protocols · Rank 08 of 8
The restaking layer everything else in that category depends on
Last verified August 18, 20264 scored axes
Documented, with gaps
EigenLayer scores 8.1 out of 10 and ranks #8 of 8 in the best defi protocols table, strongest on real usage (8.4) and weakest on revenue durability (7.4).
Created an entire category by letting staked ETH secure additional services, and holds an enormous amount of capital doing it. Slashing regimes are still being finalised, so the risk everyone has taken on is not yet fully priced.
4 axes, weighted as published in the table’s methodology. Each score below is read from the fact printed under it.
8.2/ 35% of the score
In production since 2023 holding a very large deposit base with published audits and no exploit on record; slashing is being enabled in stages, which the protocol documents.
8.4/ 25% of the score
Fees paid by secured services remain small relative to deposited capital, which the protocol's own dashboards show.
8.0/ 20% of the score
Upgrade rights sit with a multisig under a published, staged decentralisation plan.
7.4/ 20% of the score
Revenue durability is unproven: the fee base is young and the deposit base was built partly on points expectations.
EigenLayer's proposition — let staked ETH secure additional services and earn additional fees — created an entire sector, and the liquid restaking protocols in our restaking table exist downstream of it. Holding a very large deposit base since 2023 with published audits and no exploit on record is a real achievement given how much was built on it how quickly.
Fees paid by secured services remain small relative to the capital deposited, which the protocol's own dashboards show. Much of the deposit base was assembled on points expectations rather than on realised yield, and that is the open question the whole category rests on: whether enough services will pay enough to justify the risk being taken.
Penalty conditions are being enabled in stages, which the protocol documents. Until they are fully live, depositors carry a risk that is not yet fully priced and cannot be — the mechanism that would price it is not switched on.
Upgrade rights sit with a multisig under a published, staged decentralisation plan. For a protocol securing this much capital, that is the most significant residual centralisation in this table.
As venture-stage infrastructure rather than a yield product. The capital deposited is large, the fee base is small, and the gap between them is the bet everyone in the restaking table is implicitly making.
A protocol that lets staked ETH be reused to secure additional services, which earn fees and impose their own slashing conditions. It created the restaking category.
No exploit appears on its record since 2023 and its audits are published. The unresolved risks are that slashing is still being phased in and that upgrade rights remain with a multisig.
Fee income from secured services remains small relative to the capital deposited. Much of the yield to date has come from points and incentives rather than from services paying for security.
8 services in best defi protocols