Aerodrome on contract security
8.0/ 35% of the score
Deployed on Base in 2023 from the audited Velodrome codebase with published audits; no exploit on record.
Journalism for the digital-asset economy
Best Decentralised Exchanges · Rank 06 of 8
Base-native liquidity and incentive-directed pools
Last verified August 17, 20264 scored axes
Documented, with gaps
Aerodrome scores 8.2 out of 10 and ranks #6 of 8 in the best decentralised exchanges table, strongest on execution cost (9.1) and weakest on decentralisation (7.6).
The liquidity centre of Base, running a ve(3,3) design that lets emissions follow whoever pays for them. It works well while Base grows; the model's history elsewhere is a reason to watch what happens when growth stalls.
4 axes, weighted as published in the table’s methodology. Each score below is read from the fact printed under it.
8.0/ 35% of the score
Deployed on Base in 2023 from the audited Velodrome codebase with published audits; no exploit on record.
8.2/ 25% of the score
Largest pool reserves on Base; a large share of that liquidity follows weekly gauge votes funded by emissions.
9.1/ 20% of the score
Fee tiers set per pool, typically 0.01% to 0.3%; Base gas costs are low.
7.6/ 20% of the score
Core pools are immutable; gauge weights and emissions are set by veAERO holders on-chain; a team multisig retains permissions over peripheral contracts.
Deployed in 2023 from the audited Velodrome codebase, Aerodrome quickly became the venue with the largest reserves on Base, and it has no exploit on record. Execution costs are low because the chain is cheap, and fee tiers are set per pool between roughly 0.01% and 0.3%.
Weekly gauge votes by veAERO holders direct where emissions go, and liquidity follows them. Every part of that is visible on-chain, which is the honest version of a model that elsewhere has been run opaquely. It also means the depth in any given pool is a function of this week's vote as much as of organic demand.
ve(3,3) designs have a mixed record across previous implementations, most of which unwound when growth stopped and emissions could no longer buy liquidity. Aerodrome has not faced that test yet. Core pools are immutable; a team multisig retains permissions over peripheral contracts.
For swapping on Base it is the default and usually the best price available on the chain. For liquidity provision, read the current gauge vote before committing: your yield is a function of an emission allocation that is re-decided weekly, and a pool that pays well this week may not next.
Whether fee revenue grows into a share of the liquidity currently held by emissions. That transition is what separates a venue with durable depth from one renting it, and it is the single number that will move this score in either direction.
It runs on an audited codebase inherited from Velodrome with no exploit on record, and its core pools are immutable. Peripheral contracts remain under a team multisig, and the economic model has not yet been tested through a sustained downturn on Base.
AERO locked for voting power over which pools receive weekly emissions. Vote results are published on-chain, so anyone can see why liquidity moved where it did.
Yes. It is Base-native, which is the source of both its depth advantage there and its concentration risk.
8 services in best decentralised exchanges