Blur on custody & approvals
8.4/ 35% of the score
Assets remain in the user's wallet under a marketplace approval; collection bidding requires depositing ETH into an on-chain bidding contract, which is disclosed.
Journalism for the digital-asset economy
Best NFT Marketplaces · Rank 04 of 8
High-volume Ethereum traders who want bidding depth
Last verified August 17, 20264 scored axes
Documented, with gaps
Blur scores 8.3 out of 10 and ranks #4 of 8 in the best nft marketplaces table, strongest on liquidity (9.4) and weakest on coverage (7.4).
Built for traders rather than collectors, with collection-wide bidding and portfolio tools that concentrated Ethereum NFT liquidity around it. Its incentive programmes drove real volume and a lot of behaviour that only made sense while they lasted.
4 axes, weighted as published in the table’s methodology. Each score below is read from the fact printed under it.
8.4/ 35% of the score
Assets remain in the user's wallet under a marketplace approval; collection bidding requires depositing ETH into an on-chain bidding contract, which is disclosed.
8.0/ 25% of the score
Zero platform fee published; creator royalties are optional and this is stated at listing.
9.4/ 20% of the score
Deepest collection-level bid pools on Ethereum, visible on-chain; incentive programmes materially inflated 2023 volume, which the on-chain record shows.
7.4/ 20% of the score
Ethereum-focused, with aggregation across other Ethereum marketplaces.
Blur's contribution was collection-level bid pools: instead of listing and waiting, traders post bids for any item in a collection, which gives holders continuous liquidity. Combined with sweep and portfolio tooling, it pulled the professional flow off OpenSea within months and forced the incumbent to rebuild its fee structure.
There is no platform fee, which is published and real. Creator royalties are optional, stated at listing — a position that materially reduced creator income across the market. Reasonable people disagree about whether that was a correction or a harm; what matters for a reader is that Blur says which side it is on.
Token incentive programmes materially inflated 2023 volume, which the on-chain record shows. Farming activity that exists to earn BLUR is not the same as demand for the art, and anyone reading volume charts from that period should discount accordingly.
Assets remain in your wallet under a marketplace approval; collection bidding requires depositing ETH into an on-chain bidding contract, which is disclosed. Ethereum-focused, with aggregation across other Ethereum marketplaces.
High-volume Ethereum traders who want deep collection bids and portfolio tooling, and who have priced the royalty position into how they think about the market they are trading in.
No platform fee on trades. Creator royalties are optional and stated at listing, which is the policy that made Blur contentious among creators.
Assets stay in your wallet under a marketplace approval. Collection bidding does require depositing ETH into an on-chain bidding contract, which the interface discloses.
Token incentive programmes rewarded trading activity, which materially inflated volume. The on-chain record separates that farming from organic demand.
8 services in best nft marketplaces