Blockdaemon on slashing record
8.8/ 35% of the score
No slashing event on public record; publishes uptime targets under institutional service agreements.
Journalism for the digital-asset economy
Best Staking Providers · Rank 05 of 8
Enterprises that want staking and node infrastructure from one vendor
Last verified August 13, 20264 scored axes
Documented, with gaps
Blockdaemon scores 8.7 out of 10 and ranks #5 of 8 in the best staking providers table, strongest on network coverage (9.0) and weakest on fee transparency (8.0).
Sells staking as part of a wider node and API infrastructure business, which suits enterprises consolidating vendors. Pricing is enterprise-opaque and the product is not designed for individuals.
4 axes, weighted as published in the table’s methodology. Each score below is read from the fact printed under it.
8.8/ 35% of the score
No slashing event on public record; publishes uptime targets under institutional service agreements.
8.8/ 25% of the score
Offers both non-custodial delegation and custodial arrangements depending on the contract; SOC 2 Type II examined.
8.0/ 20% of the score
Pricing is contracted through a sales process and is not published.
9.0/ 20% of the score
Active-set validators across a broad network list, sold alongside node and API infrastructure.
Blockdaemon sells staking as part of a wider node and API business, which suits enterprises that would rather run one procurement process than five. Institutional service agreements come with published uptime targets, and the infrastructure carries a SOC 2 Type II examination.
It offers both non-custodial delegation and custodial arrangements. That flexibility is useful for institutions with specific mandates and it means the key question — who can move the principal — is answered by your contract rather than by the product, so read it.
Everything is contracted through a sales process. For a corporate treasury that is normal; for anyone hoping to compare rates before a call, it is a wall. There is no meaningful retail path here, and no slashing event appears on its public record.
Not yield — procurement simplicity. One vendor, one contract, one support channel covering nodes, APIs and staking, with a SOC 2 examination to hand to an auditor. That is worth paying for at scale and worth nothing to an individual.
Whether your deployment is custodial or non-custodial, because both are on offer and the answer decides who can move your principal.
It depends on the contract — both non-custodial delegation and custodial arrangements are offered, so the answer for your deployment is written in your agreement rather than fixed by the product.
Pricing is contracted through sales and not published, which is standard for enterprise infrastructure and the reason it scores below operators with public rate cards.
Not really. It is built for enterprises consolidating node, API and staking infrastructure with one vendor.
8 services in best staking providers