Skip to content

October 3, 2026

CRYPTO·COINBEAT

Journalism for the digital-asset economy

Best Perpetual DEXs · Rank 04 of 8

Aevo review

Traders who want on-chain options alongside perps

Last verified August 16, 20264 scored axes

Score8.0

Documented, with gaps

The short answer

Aevo scores 8.0 out of 10 and ranks #4 of 8 in the best perpetual dexs table, strongest on risk engine (8.2) and weakest on depth at size (7.6).

One of the few venues where a serious options book sits next to perpetuals on the same margin account, built on a dedicated rollup. Options depth is thin outside the front months, which limits how much of that promise you can use.

Key facts on record

Launched
2023
Architecture
Dedicated rollup, off-chain book
Products
Perps and options

What the record shows

4 axes, weighted as published in the table’s methodology. Each score below is read from the fact printed under it.

Aevo on risk engine

8.2/ 35% of the score

Options and perpetuals share one portfolio-margin engine with published liquidation parameters and an insurance fund; no loss-of-margin event on record since the 2023 launch.

Aevo on depth at size

7.6/ 25% of the score

Perpetual depth is mid-table; options depth concentrates in near-dated strikes and thins sharply beyond them.

Aevo on funding & fees

8.2/ 20% of the score

Published taker and maker fees; funding published per perpetual market.

Aevo on decentralisation

8.0/ 20% of the score

Runs on a dedicated rollup with a sequencer operated by the team; settlement is on-chain and margin is non-custodial.

Quick answers

What is Aevo best for?
Traders who want on-chain options alongside perps. One of the few venues where a serious options book sits next to perpetuals on the same margin account, built on a dedicated rollup.
Where does Aevo rank among best perpetual dexs?
#4 of 8, scoring 8.0 out of 10 — documented, with gaps on our band scale.
What is the weakest part of Aevo?
Depth at size at 7.6. Perpetual depth is mid-table; options depth concentrates in near-dated strikes and thins sharply beyond them.

Strengths and weaknesses

In its favour

  • Genuine options and perps on one cross-margined account
  • Dedicated rollup gives predictable fees and fast matching
  • Strong portfolio-margin implementation

Against it

  • Options liquidity thins quickly beyond near-dated strikes
  • Sequencer is operated by the team

One account, two instruments

Options and perpetuals share a single portfolio-margin engine, which means a hedge actually reduces your margin requirement instead of tying up collateral twice. Very few venues in crypto do this at all, and fewer do it on-chain. Liquidation parameters are published, an insurance fund backs the engine, and no loss-of-margin event appears on the record since the 2023 launch.

The limit is liquidity, not design

Options depth concentrates in near-dated strikes and thins quickly beyond them, so the strategies the margin engine makes possible are often not fillable at size. Perpetual depth is mid-table. The architecture promises more than the order flow currently delivers.

Who runs the rails

A dedicated rollup gives predictable fees and fast matching; the sequencer is operated by the team. Settlement is on-chain and margin is non-custodial, so the failure mode is downtime and censorship rather than loss of funds.

Practical notes

Fees and funding are published per market, and the cross-margin engine is the reason to be here rather than the option book alone. For anyone running a delta-hedged position, having both legs share margin on one venue removes the collateral drag that makes the same trade uneconomic when split across two.

Who it suits

Traders who genuinely use options rather than talking about them, at sizes the near-dated strikes can absorb. Everyone else is better served by a deeper perpetual venue.

Frequently asked questions

Can you trade options on Aevo?+

Yes, on the same portfolio-margin account as perpetuals, which is unusual on-chain. Liquidity is concentrated in near-dated strikes, so complex or longer-dated structures can be hard to fill.

Is Aevo non-custodial?+

Margin is non-custodial and settlement happens on-chain, but the venue runs on a dedicated rollup whose sequencer the team operates, so availability depends on that operator.

Has Aevo ever been exploited?+

No loss-of-margin event appears on its record since launching in 2023.

How Aevo compares

8 services in best perpetual dexs

  1. 01dYdXTraders who prioritise a conservative, well-tested risk engine8.6
  2. 02HyperliquidTraders who want centralised-venue execution without a custodian8.4
  3. 03GMXTraders who want a model they can fully understand8.2
  4. 04Aevoyou are hereTraders who want on-chain options alongside perps8.0
  5. 05VertexArbitrum traders who want a unified book and AMM8.0
  6. 06Gains NetworkTraders who want high leverage on non-crypto markets7.6
  7. 07ApeX ProtocolTraders who want an elastic-margin venue with low fees7.5
  8. 08DriftNobody yet — not until the relaunch lands and users are repaid4.5