Aevo on risk engine
8.2/ 35% of the score
Options and perpetuals share one portfolio-margin engine with published liquidation parameters and an insurance fund; no loss-of-margin event on record since the 2023 launch.
Journalism for the digital-asset economy
Best Perpetual DEXs · Rank 04 of 8
Traders who want on-chain options alongside perps
Last verified August 16, 20264 scored axes
Documented, with gaps
Aevo scores 8.0 out of 10 and ranks #4 of 8 in the best perpetual dexs table, strongest on risk engine (8.2) and weakest on depth at size (7.6).
One of the few venues where a serious options book sits next to perpetuals on the same margin account, built on a dedicated rollup. Options depth is thin outside the front months, which limits how much of that promise you can use.
4 axes, weighted as published in the table’s methodology. Each score below is read from the fact printed under it.
8.2/ 35% of the score
Options and perpetuals share one portfolio-margin engine with published liquidation parameters and an insurance fund; no loss-of-margin event on record since the 2023 launch.
7.6/ 25% of the score
Perpetual depth is mid-table; options depth concentrates in near-dated strikes and thins sharply beyond them.
8.2/ 20% of the score
Published taker and maker fees; funding published per perpetual market.
8.0/ 20% of the score
Runs on a dedicated rollup with a sequencer operated by the team; settlement is on-chain and margin is non-custodial.
Options and perpetuals share a single portfolio-margin engine, which means a hedge actually reduces your margin requirement instead of tying up collateral twice. Very few venues in crypto do this at all, and fewer do it on-chain. Liquidation parameters are published, an insurance fund backs the engine, and no loss-of-margin event appears on the record since the 2023 launch.
Options depth concentrates in near-dated strikes and thins quickly beyond them, so the strategies the margin engine makes possible are often not fillable at size. Perpetual depth is mid-table. The architecture promises more than the order flow currently delivers.
A dedicated rollup gives predictable fees and fast matching; the sequencer is operated by the team. Settlement is on-chain and margin is non-custodial, so the failure mode is downtime and censorship rather than loss of funds.
Fees and funding are published per market, and the cross-margin engine is the reason to be here rather than the option book alone. For anyone running a delta-hedged position, having both legs share margin on one venue removes the collateral drag that makes the same trade uneconomic when split across two.
Traders who genuinely use options rather than talking about them, at sizes the near-dated strikes can absorb. Everyone else is better served by a deeper perpetual venue.
Yes, on the same portfolio-margin account as perpetuals, which is unusual on-chain. Liquidity is concentrated in near-dated strikes, so complex or longer-dated structures can be hard to fill.
Margin is non-custodial and settlement happens on-chain, but the venue runs on a dedicated rollup whose sequencer the team operates, so availability depends on that operator.
No loss-of-margin event appears on its record since launching in 2023.
8 services in best perpetual dexs