Aura Finance on strategy transparency
8.4/ 30% of the score
Boosting layer for Balancer with routing verifiable on-chain.
Journalism for the digital-asset economy
Best Yield Aggregators · Rank 03 of 8
Balancer liquidity providers
Last verified August 17, 20264 scored axes
Documented, with gaps
Aura Finance scores 8.5 out of 10 and ranks #3 of 8 in the best yield aggregators table, strongest on yield durability (8.6) and weakest on security record (8.4).
Does for Balancer what Convex did for Curve, with a comparable design and a clean record since launch. The dependency chain runs one protocol deeper than Convex's, which is worth a point.
4 axes, weighted as published in the table’s methodology. Each score below is read from the fact printed under it.
8.4/ 30% of the score
Boosting layer for Balancer with routing verifiable on-chain.
8.4/ 30% of the score
In production since 2022 with published audits and no exploit of its own contracts on record.
8.6/ 20% of the score
Returns are Balancer trading fees plus BAL and AURA emissions, reported separately.
8.6/ 20% of the score
Fee split published as a fixed percentage of harvested rewards.
Aura boosts Balancer LP returns through vote-escrow mechanics without requiring the depositor to lock anything themselves. The routing is verifiable on-chain, the fee split is published as a fixed percentage of harvested rewards, and the protocol has run since 2022 with no exploit of its own contracts.
Everything Aura does depends on Balancer, whose incident list runs to three serious events including the November 2025 stable-pool exploit worth up to $128m. A boosting layer inherits the risk of the venue it boosts, so the honest way to read this page is alongside our Balancer review rather than instead of it.
Balancer trading fees plus BAL and AURA emissions, reported separately so income and dilution can be told apart.
Anyone already providing liquidity on Balancer, for whom this is close to a free improvement on the same position — and nobody who is not.
As an extension of a Balancer position you already hold, not as a standalone allocation, and with the November 2025 exploit priced in. The boosting layer improves your return; it does not change which venue's contracts are holding your liquidity.
Which pool type you are in — the weighted pools were untouched in 2025, and the composable stable pools were not.
It boosts returns for Balancer liquidity providers through vote-escrow mechanics, without requiring the depositor to lock BAL themselves. Routing is verifiable on-chain.
No exploit of its own contracts appears on its record since 2022. Its risk is inherited: it depends entirely on Balancer, which has three serious incidents on its record including a November 2025 exploit.
Same mechanism, different underlying venue — Convex boosts Curve, Aura boosts Balancer. The difference in risk comes from the venues, not the boosting layers.
8 services in best yield aggregators