Origin Protocol on strategy transparency
8.6/ 30% of the score
Publishes the strategy allocations behind its rebasing tokens, updated on-chain.
Journalism for the digital-asset economy
Best Yield Aggregators · Rank 05 of 8
Set-and-forget yield-bearing stablecoin exposure
Last verified August 17, 20264 scored axes
Documented, with gaps
Origin Protocol scores 8.3 out of 10 and ranks #5 of 8 in the best yield aggregators table, strongest on strategy transparency (8.6) and weakest on security record (7.8).
OUSD and its ETH sibling are rebasing tokens that accrue yield in the wallet with no vault interaction at all, which is the simplest user experience in the category. A 2020 exploit is old but remains part of the record.
4 axes, weighted as published in the table’s methodology. Each score below is read from the fact printed under it.
8.6/ 30% of the score
Publishes the strategy allocations behind its rebasing tokens, updated on-chain.
7.8/ 30% of the score
In production since 2020; a November 2020 flash-loan exploit took roughly $7m, after which the protocol repaid affected users and rebuilt with additional audits.
8.4/ 20% of the score
Yield is sourced from named lending and AMM strategies rather than from its own token emissions.
8.4/ 20% of the score
Performance fee published and applied at the rebase level.
OUSD and its ETH sibling rebase, so the balance in your wallet grows without any interaction at all. For a user who wants exposure to DeFi yield without learning what a vault is, that is the simplest product in this table, and the strategy allocations behind it are published and updated on-chain.
A flash-loan exploit took roughly $7m through a missing validation check. Origin published a compensation plan covering the full value deposited at the time of the attack, repaid affected users, and rebuilt with additional audits. The incident is old and it is on the record; so is the repayment.
Named lending and AMM strategies rather than the protocol's own token emissions, which means the return is income rather than dilution. The performance fee is published and applied at the rebase level.
Rebasing tokens interact awkwardly with some protocols, which expect a balance that only changes when you move it. Check before using one as collateral.
Holders who want DeFi yield with no vault management at all, in a token that grows in the wallet. It is the least demanding product in this table by a distance.
Whether the protocol you intend to deposit into handles rebasing balances correctly. Several do not, and the failure mode is confusing rather than dangerous.
Through named lending and AMM strategies whose allocations are published on-chain, with returns rebasing directly into holders' balances rather than requiring a claim.
Yes, in November 2020, for roughly $7m through a missing validation check. The protocol published a plan covering the full deposited value, repaid affected users and rebuilt with additional audits.
One whose balance in your wallet increases automatically as yield accrues. It is simple to hold and can behave unexpectedly inside protocols that assume balances only change on transfer.
8 services in best yield aggregators