Beefy Finance on strategy transparency
8.4/ 30% of the score
Each vault names the underlying farm and its strategy contract, verifiable on-chain.
Journalism for the digital-asset economy
Best Yield Aggregators · Rank 04 of 8
Multi-chain auto-compounding across many small ecosystems
Last verified August 17, 20264 scored axes
Documented, with gaps
Beefy Finance scores 8.4 out of 10 and ranks #4 of 8 in the best yield aggregators table, strongest on fees (8.6) and weakest on yield durability (8.0).
The widest chain coverage in the category by a distance, with an auto-compounding model that is simple enough to reason about and a long record without a core exploit. Strategy quality varies with the chain you are on.
4 axes, weighted as published in the table’s methodology. Each score below is read from the fact printed under it.
8.4/ 30% of the score
Each vault names the underlying farm and its strategy contract, verifiable on-chain.
8.4/ 30% of the score
In production since 2020 across more than twenty chains with published audits and no core-contract exploit on record.
8.0/ 20% of the score
Much of the quoted APY on smaller chains is emission-funded, and the interface separates the components.
8.6/ 20% of the score
Performance fee published per vault and taken from harvested rewards.
More than twenty chains, most of them places where no other aggregator bothers to deploy. If you hold assets on a smaller network, Beefy is often the only auto-compounding option that exists, and it has run since 2020 with published audits and no core-contract exploit.
Each vault names the underlying farm and its strategy contract, and the mechanism — harvest rewards, swap, redeposit — is simple enough to verify without specialist knowledge. Compounding manually costs gas and attention; this is worth a performance fee for that reason alone.
On smaller chains, much of the quoted APY is emission-funded rather than paid by users, and the interface separates the components so you can see which is which. Vault quality also varies by chain: the same protocol operating on twenty networks cannot supervise all of them equally.
Multi-chain holders who want positions compounding without manual work, and who read the yield breakdown rather than the headline.
Judge the underlying farm, not the wrapper. Beefy's contracts are the same everywhere; what differs by chain is the quality of the protocol your money ends up in, and that is where losses in this category come from.
Multi-chain holders with positions scattered across networks where no other aggregator has deployed.
Its core contracts have run since 2020 across many chains with published audits and no core-contract exploit. The variable risk is the underlying farm each vault deposits into, which differs enormously in quality by chain.
A performance fee published per vault and taken from harvested rewards, which is usually less than the gas cost of compounding manually at a similar frequency.
Because much of the return there is funded by token emissions rather than by fees users pay. The interface separates the two components.
8 services in best yield aggregators